<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Social Inequality &#8211; Chasing Profits To Destruction</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.laitman.com/2009/06/social-inequality-chasing-profits-to-destruction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.laitman.com/2009/06/social-inequality-chasing-profits-to-destruction/</link>
	<description>Kabbalah and the Meaning of Life - Michael Laitman&#039;s Personal Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 15:12:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat R., Boston, MA</title>
		<link>http://www.laitman.com/2009/06/social-inequality-chasing-profits-to-destruction/comment-page-1/#comment-4086</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat R., Boston, MA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 14:48:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laitman.com/?p=4827#comment-4086</guid>
		<description>Basic common sense suggests that if mankind does not progress together in an optimal fashion towards trade, discriminatory trade is the only other option. There is nothing religious or philosophical about it, but instead it is a natural consequence of utility between the weak and the strong.

Ultimately, everyone wants the same thing: human progress in an architecture of environmental security - very little of which is being achieved across cultures and societies despite the huge profits made within isolated industries. 

If this is not all of mankind&#039;s business for self preservation, what is?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Basic common sense suggests that if mankind does not progress together in an optimal fashion towards trade, discriminatory trade is the only other option. There is nothing religious or philosophical about it, but instead it is a natural consequence of utility between the weak and the strong.</p>
<p>Ultimately, everyone wants the same thing: human progress in an architecture of environmental security &#8211; very little of which is being achieved across cultures and societies despite the huge profits made within isolated industries. </p>
<p>If this is not all of mankind&#8217;s business for self preservation, what is?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

